The Archive Page 1

NWO, Illuminati, Nazi Zionist Government (Jim Marrs)

Looking into things like 9/11, Bloodlines and history.

Jim Marrs – Our Occulted History

 Jim Marrs looks back at the origins mankind and charts our occulted history up to the present day.

 Max Igan – The Calling

In March 2009 Max Igan was approached to create a combined and summarized version of “The Big Picture”, “Fight the NWO With Global Non Compliance” and “NWO The Final Solution.”

Wake Up Call – New World Order

For all the people who somehow think that something in the government has changed because of the election, this is your WAKE UP CALL! Before you dismiss this film as some sort of conspiracy nonsense, I challenge you to DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH on the topics covered! Its time to WAKE UP!

End of Liberty

Looking into the monetary system.

America: Freedom to Fascism

Determined to find the law that requries American citizens to pay income tax, producer Aaron Russo (Bette Midler’sThe Rose, Trading Places) set out on a journey to find the evidence. Neither left nor right-wing, this startling examination of government exposes the systematic erosion of civil liberties in America since 1913 when the Federal Reserve system was fraudulently created. Through interviews with two U.S. Congressmen, former IRS Commissioner and former IRS and FBI agents, tax attorneys and authors, Russo connects the dots between money creation, federal income tax, and the national identity card, which becomes law in May 2008 and will use Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)

 Holocaust and holy war: Israel, World War III, and collective insanity

Prof. Jerry Kroth discusses the most volatile 35 acre site on planet earth, Haram-al-Sharif or what Israeli’s call the Temple Mount. While rational and sane negotiations proceed to resolve conflict at a snail’s pace, there are four collective, dark forces which impose themselves on this area: extreme Islamic fundamentalism, militant messianism, radical Christian evangelism, and the “inspired lunacy” of territoriality. These ‘four horsemen of the apocalypse’ predispose the entire region to nuclear annihilation.

Dark Secrets: Inside Bohemian Grove

This is the Alex Jones Film Inside Bohemian Grove. This is the famous footage shot by Alex Jones of what the world elite are doing in the remote mountains of northern California.

 Endgame

For the New World Order, a world government is just the beginning. Once in place’ they can engage their plan to exterminate 80% of the world’s population while enabling the “elites” to live forever with the aid of advanced technology. For the first time, crusading filmmaker ALEX JONES reveals their secret plan for humanity’s extermination: Operation ENDGAME.
Jones chronicles the history of the global elite’s bloody rise to power and reveals how they have funded dictators and financed the bloodiest wars—creating order out of chaos to pave the way for the first true world empire. * Watch as Jones and his team track the elusive Bilderberg Group to Ottawa and Istanbul to document their secret summits, allowing you to witness global kingpins setting the world’s agenda and instigating World War III. * Learn about the formation of the North America transportation control grid, which will end U.S. sovereignty forever. * Discover how the practitioners of the pseudo-science eugenics have taken control of governments worldwide as a means to carry out depopulation. * View the progress of the coming collapse of the United States and the formation of the North American Union.

Alex Jones vs The Mainstream Media

A documentary film from Know More News exposing the Mainstream Media’s propaganda campaign to smear Alex Jones and his website Infowars.

 Saturn, Satan & God And The Nature of Reality Part 1&2

Part 1 And 2 together a look into the bible and Saturn and the relation to our reality. A must watch…

 The GREAT Muammar Gaddafi. If the Western World Only Knew the Truth.

Everything we have been told about Muammar Gaddafi is a western fabrication to further their new world agenda. Please take the time to watch this documentary on this great leader and share it far and wide.
This video is combined from YouTube’r Dale Flores where you can find it split in 15 minute sections.

Muammar Gaddafi (Qaddafi) Biography Years before he is Murdered LIBYA

Biography of Libyan Revolutionary Leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi many years before he was friendly with the West and ultimately killed – murdered – assassinated.

9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money

Forget for one moment everything you’ve been told about September 11, 2001. 9/11 was a crime. And as with any crime, there is one overriding imperative that detectives must follow to identify the perpetrators: follow the money. This is an investigation of the 9/11 money trail.

9/11: Decade of Deception 

On the tenth anniversary of the Attacks of September 11th, 2001, expert witnesses gathered at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada to provide evidence-based research that called into question the official story of 9/11. This was known as The Toronto Hearings on 9/11.
Over a period of four days, these experts in Structural Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, and History gave researched and professional testimony to an international panel of distinguished judges. The panel of judges, in conjunction with the steering committee would go on to publish their final analysis of the evidence provided, which called for a new investigation into the Attacks of September 11th, 2001.

How Big Oil Conquered the World

From farm to pharmaceutical, diesel truck to dinner plate, pipeline to plastic product, it is impossible to think of an area of our modern-day lives that is not affected by the oil industry. The story of oil is the story of the modern world. And this is the story of those who helped shape that world, and how the oil-igarchy they created is on the verge of monopolizing life itself.

Century of Enslavement: The History of The Federal Reserve

What is the Federal Reserve system? How did it come into existence? Is it part of the federal government? How does it create money? Why is the public kept in the dark about these important matters? In this feature-length documentary film, The Corbett Report explores these important question and pulls back the curtain on America’s central bank.

Zeitgeist

The first of three films by Peter Joseph looking into topics such as religion, 9/11 and the monetary system. The film exposes the reality of these facets of human life in a clear and straight forward manner. This trilogy serves as a great place to start.

Zeitgeist: Addendum

This is the second film which is directed and produced by Peter Joseph.
The first film he created was Zeitgeist: The Movie in 2007.
Zeitgeist: Addendum attempts to locate the root causes of this pervasive social corruption, while offering a solution.
This solution is not based on politics, morality, laws, or any other “establishment” notions of human affairs, but rather on a modern, non-superstitious based understanding of what we are and how we align us with nature, to which we are a part.
The work advocates a new social system which is updated to present day knowledge, highly influenced by the life long work of Jacque Fresco and The Venus Project.

Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

On Jan. 15th, 2011, “Zeitgeist: Moving Forward” was released theatrically to sold out crowds in 60 countries; 31 languages; 295 cities and 341 Venues. It has been noted as the largest non-profit independent film release in history.
This is a non-commercial work and is available online for free viewing and no restrictions apply to uploading/download/posting/linking – as long as no money is exchanged.
A Free DVD Torrent of the full 2 hr and 42 min film in 30 languages is also made available through the main website [below], with instructions on how one can download and burn the movie to DVD themselves. His other films are also freely available in this format.

Fluoride: Poison On Tap

Is fluoride bad for you? Should you be concerned about sodium fluoride being in your water or toothpaste? Learn why Sweden, Norway, Austria, Finland, China and more countries have banned fluoride. How did fluoride get approved for use in the United States and what are the health effects? Learn everything you need to know about fluoride and what you can do. Click “show more” to learn more about fluoride.

Welcome to the Truth

His is an informative and coherent documentary that exposes the hidden truth that you will never or very rarely get to see in the mainstream media. It has to do with the rule of secrecy behind the scenes of world politics, that has been steadily working on a covert plan to dominate the world and rule over us all without our consent. The world needs to wake up to this reality before it’s too late.

Esoteric Agenda

Showing how Esoteric Ideas and philosophies influence all aspects of modern politics

Celestial Illuminations (Symbols of Ancient Rome, Egypt, Babylon and Sumer)

Symbology and traditions of Rome, Egypt, Babylon and Sumer

Symbols of an Alien Sky

Here we offer David Talbott’s first glimpses of celestial dramas in ancient times. Just a few thousand years ago a gathering of planets hung as towering forms in the ancient sky close to the earth, provoking spectacular electric discharge formations above our forebears and inspiring the vast complex of world myths and symbols.

Psywar

This film explores the evolution of propaganda and public relations in the United States, with an emphasis on the “elitist theory of democracy” and the relationship between war, propaganda and class.

 

 

Facebook is Poison: A Snapshot of the Tyranny of the Masses.

This post is an attempt to analyse what has unfortunately been my experience of engaging with society in the near 36 years that I have been alive. I have seen many shades of the tyranny of the masses in my time and it takes many other forms, however, this for me is a very good example of what happens when an individual tries to tell a group what it does not want to hear. Please Bear with me as the set up is rather long because I wanted to include the entire conversation.

In this post, I will try to demonstrate, from an exchange that I had on Facebook, some of the dynamics of the herd mentality, specifically:

  • The unwillingness to consider a different point of view
  • The ignorance of youth and the herd
  • The methods of discrediting the messenger rather than the message
  • The desire to win the argument at all costs
  • The success of propaganda/PR (Public Relations) on the herd
  • The way in which the members of the group use each other to prop themselves up by way of the bandwagon and its inherent cowardice
  • The belief in a Messiah who will save them
  • Collectivism as an ideology
  • How the masses shout down what they do not want to hear

I will do this by analysing the exchange as it happened, The examples will be given in the order that they came as best as I remember. This whole episode begins with me commenting on a post that was recommending Jeremy Corbyn in the 2017 UK general election. The person who made this recommendation is someone that I knew in the real world and this person had expressed some interest in the kinds of information on this blog, this person is around 20 years old.

To my understanding the falseness Left, Right paradigm is one of the very first things that we encounter when we set foot on this journey of greater awareness. For a person to drop this and fall into a red or blue box just because an election has been called shows that there is a clear distinction between what that person says and what they do.

Example 1A1

So in this image, I am giving a comment on the original status (the angry face did not appear till later)

His reply in Example 2A2

So you’ve always been the same until that is, you were eligible to vote then you’ve rushed into the arms of the first messiah who is telling you what you want to hear. In fairness to this person, this is an easy logical trap to fall into until you understand that by voting you are giving your consent to the system above the candidate. At this point I am also abliged to let you know that there was a time when I would have agreed with 90% of what these people were saying.

Around a day has passed and at this point, I thought that conversation was over until this genius chimes in with…

Example 3A3

This is the first voice which comes to shout down my argument. Notice the use of “We” and the blaming of capitalism (which is a brand name for an idea) for all of the world’s ills. Also be aware I have previously implied, admittedly in a subtle way, that it is “the mechanism” that I object to. Now perhaps I did not make that crystal clear at this point but in doing so, I was able to better gage what I was dealing with in a person I had never heard of before.

To answer this statement, what “we” are being asked to do is put a cross in a box on a certain day and then go about our business as normal. This example clearly shows the success of the PR consultant in dramatising Corbyn as an embattled defender of justice who just needs your help to take on the big evil forces of Capitalism. (Dramatisation is one of many propaganda tactics laid out in Edward Bernays’ 1928 book “Propaganda”).

Example 4A4

This is what came next, the first part seemed pretty reasonable to me until the last few lines, it certainly did not carry the same tone as Example 3. The cheerleading is noteworthy here but also the belief in the messianic figure is on full display. How does this person know that Corbyn can or will do any of the things he ascribes to him. In mentioning the greater good he shows his “Big C” Collectivist thinking very clearly and the herd mentality has started to become evident

One of the funniest things about this exchange was that these people did not even realise that they were defending the establishment of which they claim to be against.

Example 5

A5

Where to start with this, firstly that isn’t thinking deep, it’s justifying your position secondly the faith in the messiah is evident again and thirdly his job, if elected would be to make Britain a better place, not the world. My response stands up to this quite well here because, though I do not have a crystal ball and cannot say for 100% that Corbyn will do nothing or next to nothing for the people, history does tend to back me up on this.

Example 6A62

Wikipedia defines Capitalism as “an economic system and an ideology based on private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit.[1][2][3] Characteristics central to capitalism include private property, capital accumulation, wage labor, voluntary exchange, a price system, and competitive markets.[4][5] In a capitalist market economy, decision-making and investment are determined by the owners of the factors of production in financial and capital markets, and prices and the distribution of goods are mainly determined by competition in the market. ” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism

This person seems to have only read the first line of this paragraph and conveniently disregarded the rest of it, he also fails to mention the role of the banks which is rather crucial when you consider the bankers’ bailouts and the fractional reserve system. The banks are oddly never mentioned in this thread, I should slap myself for that error but it just shows compartmentalised the thinking out there is and how easy it is to fall into it.

I am no great fan of Capitalism in general but to ignore the fact that it is a brand name for an idea and suggest that it is soely responsible for all of the world’s ills without acknowledging the banks’ role in the current situation or the benefits of Capitalism that he enjoys is rediculous. Even within the confines of his rather limited and simplified argument, surely it is people’s greed which is the true culprit and he also fails to make clear just exactly who he thinks Capitalism is. He is right in what he says about excessive privatisation to the best of my knowledge but then he goes on to describe his messiah again and in asking “How is helping the poor evil?” He has assumed that Corbyn has helped the poor instead of just courted their vote

At this point, I have seen the folly of continuing this discussion, I could see that it was going to get unpleasant so I decided to state my point and make my exit. Note the change in my tone. I reiterate the thrust of my argument was to not consent to the system by voting, politicians are all talk and propaganda and the only person you can truly rely on is yourself.

And now, without further ado, here comes the gem that proves almost every bullet point that I set out at the beginning, this and what followed it shows the mass of sheep in all their glory.

Example 7

A7

Paragraph 1

So the messiah has talked about wars and human rights, I’m not an expert on Corbyn so I wouldn’t know if he has actually done anything about any of these issues outside of a political umbrella but this first paragraph has failed to enlighten me about what he considers the root cause to be and again he has made assertions about his messiah that he cannot demonstrate, he has also made a stab at claiming that he understands the motives of the media which is, I’m am assuming, where he is quoting this narrative from.

Paragraph 2

Here he shows his true collectivist colours in this second paragraph which he starts by calling me a liar and then proceeds to give me this gem. “We’ve tried ruling ourselves and it led to monarchy” You couldn’t make it up could you, where to start with this?

  1. When did we try ruling ourselves?
  2. How did it get to Monarchy?
  3. We still have a Monarchy.

I would also add he is still using “We” because if he had of started with “I have have tried ruling myself” he may have opened himself up to a new way of thinking. This sentence in itself shows

  • The unwillingness to consider a different point of view
  • The ignorance of youth and the herd
  • The desire to win the argument at all costs
  • The success of propaganda/PR (Public Relations) on the herd
  • The belief in a Messiah who will save them
  • Collectivism as an ideology

Six out of nine statements that I set out to demonstrate in one sentence! This person simply cannot conceive of circumstances in which there are no figures of authority for people to pass the responsibility for their lives on to. He then states that humans have never had it so good since creating Democracy but leaves out things like private property, and capital accumulation, wage labour, voluntary exchange, a price system, and competitive markets which are associated with Capitalism.

The next line is pretty priceless as well “People can’t rule themselves because they are programmed to cheat”. Speak for yourself mate. This is, most likely, a projection of his internal narrative but it warrants examination.

  1. What gives you the right to decide that a person cannot rule his or herself?
  2. Is he programmed to cheat?
  3. Are people programmed to cheat?
  4. What or who is programming them to cheat?
  5. Why would people be programmed to cheat?
  6. How are people programmed to cheat?
  7. What is meant by the term “cheat” ie. Cheat what?

I do agree that we are indeed “fallible creatures” but by that logic, his Messiah Corbyn is also fallible and if people cannot rule themselves exactly what business do they have putting themselves forward to rule anyone else. He then asks what’s to stop the rape of the planet if we were to do away with Big Brothers Iron Fist. He really is totally oblivious to the fact that all of the problems that he talks about have happened and are happening within the system he is defending.

It is conscience and the do no harm principle that needs to be instilled in people, not the clamor for saviors and authorities, people like this person are just begging the government to take all of our rights away with this kind of thinking. The other thing he is missing is that the natural resources he’s talking about are being used to make the consumer goods that we all buy in some measure.

My response to this person was to throw in the towel as I could see there was no reasoning with him, however, given the obvious sarcasm in my response, you will be surprised to discover that he left it at this.

Example 8A11

In situations such as this, I have no problem rolling over, Facebook battles aren’t worth the effort. All my interest really is in these situations, is getting the measure of the person I am talking with.

Time now to demonstrate the other 3 bullet point

  • The methods of discrediting the messenger rather than the messages
  • The way in which the members of the group use each other to prop themselves up by way of the bandwagon and the inherent cowardice of this
  • How the masses shout down what they do not want to hear

Example 9A8

I think this speaks for itself. These people were the bandwagon jumpers who hopped on toward the end. None of the people in this example had the courage to engage me straight away, they waited for the argument to be dead before they dared venture into it.

I sincerely do hope that I am wrong about Corbyn and our system but I doubt it. I have not offered any analysis of my comments either, it does not follow that all of my assertions in the Facebook thread are totally correct but they are my true feelings on the matter of the election at this moment in time and they are based on my life experience and research such as it is.

It also does not follow that my assertions in this post are totally correct, it could be argued that these are just simply young people, who come from a generation that has been made to pick up the pieces of the past failures of the system, who are excited about the first election that they are old enough to vote in and that I am being too sensitive. But given that they very much do seem to largely be repeating the propaganda from TV and the internet, namely Facebook, I hold to my conclusions and feel that I have adequately demonstrated all of the points that I set out to demonstrate. One caveat to this is that these people, in the majority, were very young which means that they have plenty of time to change their views as they become more knowledgeable and experienced.

I am grateful for this exchange because it has given the opportunity to finally write this article. This kind of subject has been floating around in my head for a while now and this exchange provided me with the perfect means of framing it.

Addendum

If we are to look a little deeper into this mode of behaviour and try to presume what purpose it may have once served human beings, the most logical roots of it, to me, seems to be is in terms of warding off a threat.

Picture the scenario,

  • You have an Aggressor standing at the entrance to the village,
  • He starts to make threats and motions that he is about to pillage the village,
  • A brave villager (Villager one) notices the Aggressor and steps up to confront him,
  • They engage in combat,
  • Another villager sees the fight and comes to the aid of Villager one,
  • The three of them now are causing a good deal of commotion so more of the villagers come to Villager one’s aid,
  • The Aggressor, knowing he is outnumbered, retreats
  • And the villagers have successfully defended their village.

This kind of behaviour can be easily observed in the animal kingdom as well, for example, when one wildebeest in a herd sees a lion he can start a stampede. So if it is indeed a threat response for the herd to band together to shut out the outsider that is being triggered here, exactly what threat did challenging this system of government on a Facebook thread pose to these people?

I have an idea but I’ll leave it open-ended.

Facebook is Poison

I am sure we have all seen exchanges of this kind on Facebook and taken part in some, I know I have. But I do not relish these types of situations and ultimately never enjoy them, there is, at least for me, a compulsion to keep checking for responses and keep arguing especially when it is me that is on the receiving end as if ending a pointless argument or not having the last word is some kind of weakness, well it isn’t, Facebook is a weakness. The false sense of connectedness it creates is a weakness, wanting to know what’s going on in the world of Facebook is the weakness. This forum allows the masses to bully the individual thousands of times a day and it shows people at their worst in far too many ways to list 24/7. The very nature of the forum encourages these kinds of dividing lines, it does not lend itself to cool and calm deconstructive analysis and as such, any kind of constructive debate is almost impossible on Facebook. For many people, Facebook is a dependency and it is one that they do not need. This, for me, was the final lesson that has made me see sense and delete my profile.

 

 

 

 

YouTube Must Fail (Or at least have a Competitor)

My Thoughts on YouTube set to Final Fantasy Vice (Original Tune)

Youtube has degenerated quite significantly since Google took over, the website has been constantly changed to the point where it is hard to know even how to operate it. Google has only ever supported the most successful channels, you need to have 1000 subscribers before they even acknowledge you and many of the changes that they have made make it next to impossible to grow a new channel. Other changes include scrapping the video response and friends features, changing the subscriber feed so you don’t automatically see what you are subscribed to and Google + to name a few. Changes that Google have not made are making cover photos and channel icons easier to set up and allowing channels to change their names easily, features that the other sites all incorporate.

The content on YouTube has also evolved. When I started on YouTube there was a fair amount of good content that had a shelf life, in other words, there were many videos that were worth watching more than once. For example:

You can clearly see that a huge amount of work was put into making this video back in the earlier days of YouTube. The person who made this video is a man named Anthony Siguido, he also made a making-of video about the process.

After watching this video it becomes painfully apparent that making this video was a mammoth task. Meaning that the frequency in which he could produce this kind of material would have been extremely low, making sustaining a YouTube earning any ad revenue virtually impossible. I show this as an example of the change in the content as the platform has grown and as a sad reminder of the quality of work that could be found on Youtube back then.

Over time, the main thrust of content has moved toward hyper-current, one-time only view, throw away vlogs, reviews, top 10’s and so on. The reason for this is that more and more people are chasing the dream of being an “internet celebrity” and earning their living from making videos and these types of video represent an easy way to get views. Views and time watched equate to more advertising money and the circle-jerk is complete.

Although this is a comedy video it does hit on many the problems with YouTube since Google took over, pay close attention to the background.

Youtube Truly Sucks PRR Rants (From the time of Google+ Oddly still relevant)

Firstly YouTube needs competition to elaborate on the theme in my video at the top of this article  My Thoughts on YouTube set to Final Fantasy Vice (Original Tune), (yes I did use it my own music because I needed a video for the tune and a tune for the video, six of one etc) creators need to take one or two of their regularly scheduled video and move them exclusively to Vidme, Vimeo, Dailymotion or any other video sharing site. If bigger YouTube creators were to do this it would really put the cat amongst the pigeons and Google would eventually have to respond. Smaller channels (with tiny amounts of views, subs and no revenue) should move altogether. Obviously, this is only my suggestion, any person reading this will, quite rightly, do what’s best for them.

Another thing to bare in mind for creators who have made the move to Vidme, Vimeo or Dailymotion etc is that their new site of choice does end up becoming YouTube Mk 2. I say this because this is the floor in my argument for change. If creators move over to the newer sites and just carry on as if they were on YouTube then no real change will occur. The only thing that a person can really change is themselves, with the monetisation of videos, it is not in any creators interest to help the competition, pulling the ladder up after you have climbed to the top, so to speak. One idea I had was to do a monthly picks video where I would have looked for four or five videos and showed them to my audience, unfortunately, I managed to acquire an audience.

The New Televangelism

I despise being asked for donations by content creators, This kind of collection bowl, hand out mentality is the new televangelism. At a time when attitudes are hardening toward people on welfare benefits, the sick and the homeless, how some of these people have the brass neck to ask for money so they can make videos for a living is beyond me but what’s worse is that people give their money to these channels. People complain about welfare benefits but they support the military, in essence, what they are saying is that that are quite happy for their money to be spent on killing people but not feeding them and this general lack of generosity in people’s attitudes, is terminal for a community, online or anywhere else. I do agree with the idea that taxation is theft but seeing as taxation is fact of life I would rather see that money go to people to feed themselves than to the machinery of war.

YouTube has become a monster in every sense of the word, should one or more of these sites become a legitimate challenger it will need to be fundamentally different and that will require everyone involved, administrators, creators and the audience to really think about their behaviour whilst they are online and make a positive change. I realise that if anyone reads this it may be quite unpopular but I ask that you to think about some of the points I have raised and not to take this article as a personal criticism, it is very easy to get swept up in the smallest of things (like YouTube) and this article, in part, is just my attempt to give you pause as others did for me.

Disillusionment with The Truther Industrial Complex

Before I start, I would like to give credit to Cip from the YouTube channel Cips Clips for the term and definition, “Truther Industrial Complex” who, to the best of my knowledge was the person created it and pointing out (to me) many of the things that I am writing about in this article.

There are many shows in the independent media, so called, that do a very good job of widening people’s awareness of the world and its goings on especially in the early stages when people become aware of the fact that things are not right in the world (in other words at the start of their awakening). I dislike the term awakening but it serves in this instance. Many of these shows, however, are also using the propagation of “truth” to earn a living for their presenters. This causes a problem for the makers of these shows, on the one hand, they are spreading a message that is unpopular and sometimes thought of as crazy and on the other hand, they need to make a living. So when things advertising revenue are added into the mix these shows are faced with the choice of holding true to their purpose or becoming more advertiser-friendly. Quite often in my life, I have thought that you can only hold the principles that you financially afford and this is unfortunately so often the case.

There also many scam artists who use the “truth” to frighten people and sell them the solution but even with the best will in the world with whatever you do, if you give any priority to making money with the thing that you are doing, be it alternative theories and viewpoints, music, science etc, you will be faced with the choice of do I do what’s right or do I do what’s right for my wallet and many people will then delude themselves into thinking that they can do both at the same time, which, more often than not, they cannot.

When it comes to the Truth movement, I have noticed a number of things about some of the personalities and specifically their conduct which is worth noting:

  1. They constantly pick at the mainstream media but when it backs them up they parrot it.
  2. They offer content for free and then once they have the desired audience they remove that content and charge for access to it. It was free, now it ain’t.
  3. They have gone to painstaking lengths to make sure that their audience. understands the Jewdeism is religion, not a race, while at the same time as they are talking. about Islam as if it’s a race and not just a religion.
  4. There are also a number of them who demonise the political left in favour or the hard right when they were supposed to be apolitical.
  5. They claim to be independent but they have sponsors.
  6. They endorse products.
  7. They claim to be better than the mainstream media when scrutinising the mainstream media but don’t put their guests to the same scrutiny.
  8. Some of them will constantly make predictions of doom which either only partially come true or never happen.
  9. A number of them engage in Problem, Reaction, Solution Marketing.

There are probably many more instances of there of these kinds contradictions in their actions but these were the ones that leapt out at me. There is a hardcore of these shows that are becoming very right wing indeed but there are still shows and speakers that you can get some good info from every now and then, depending on what subjects interest you. I deliberately have chosen not to name specific shows because that is not my way, I know others do and fair play to them for doing it.

I would hope (rather naively) that some of the personalities would read this article and take a moment of pause, but I very much doubt anyone will read this article so that scenario is pretty unlikely. Chuckle chuckle. Bottom Line, first and most importantly of all, be honest about what you are doing and why you are doing it with yourself. Only then can you pursue your aims and articulate them effectively. If you are not honest all round, you will give yourself away, of course, may get away with this a few times but in the end, you will be found out.

Remove the Noise and the Truth Emerges

For a long time, I have had this idea that when you remove the noise the truth emerges. there are many examples that can be given for this but generally should you remove all of the side elements of a problem and the disguising factors you will find the problem’s source.

Take muscle knots, for instance, you have a pain in your neck you press the spot on your neck and massage, you feel a little discomfort but discover that the knot is not in your neck, you move up to the back of your head and feel around, you find a sore spot and follow it to the side of your head and bang, that really hurts and you have found the source of the pain in your neck. The tightness in the small muscle attachments that link your neck to your skull was the real issue that was causing the pain lower down in your neck, massage this area and your pain is relieved. As an aside, this can often be the cause of migraines.

The purpose of this article is not, however, to discuss migraines. Migraines are a good example in many ways because many people are not aware of the phenomena of muscle knots so as soon as they get a headache they reach for the pills. Headaches can also be caused by hunger, thirst, anxiety and lack of sleep, to name a few of the other more manageable causes, of course, they can indicate a more serious problem as well. However, this article is to discuss a couple of examples of the noise of life.

We often hear that happiness is the goal of life, people say that you must grab life by both hands and go after what you want, you have a duty to enjoy as much of life as you possibly can and the purpose of life is the pursuit of happiness. This noise creates a lot of pressure for the person who doesn’t feel that they are doing this and I would imagine that there are a great many people that fit this category.

For me, these expressions are incomplete, (when the opportunity presents) you must grab it with both hands, you have a duty to enjoy life (for what it is) for example. on the other hand “the pursuit of happiness” idea is as ambiguous a phrase as the “war on terror” which is a physical war on a mental ideology with no clear enemy.

So we need to get into this phrase “the pursuit of happiness” and break it down. Two questions emerge from this phrase what is happiness and how or even, can, it be pursued. Happiness is not a state of mind or a choice, in this situation the word “happiness” has been confused with positivity which is a state of mind and a choice.

Happiness is a moment in time and perhaps something that can only really be appreciated through reminiscence and in contrast to other unhappy times in your life, therefore it cannot really be pursued.

The truth is that life is to be enjoyed but it is also to be endured, tolerated, appreciated, suffered, thought about and learned from. Happiness will be found in memories, it is contentment and comfort that we actually pursue.

This is a simple example of how to remove the noise because anything in your life that is not what you have identified as your main goals could be considered noise and much of it can be simply muted and removed in this analytical kind of way. There will be very real problems in life that must be tackled because these are the obstacles that we must overcome. Noise masks problems and solutions, it hides the obstacles from us and also robs us of our happy moments. One of the easiest ways to simplify your life is to remove the noise.

The Archive Page 4

Ancient Advanced Technology in Peru and Bolivia

Join Researcher David Hatcher Childress and British Engineer Christopher Dunn as they journey to Cuzco in the Andes Mountains to examine the evidence for the possible use of advanced rock-machining techniques. Going to ancient cities and megalithic quarries, they again examine saw marks, advanced lifting and moving techniques, as well as evidence of Pre-Incan megalith builders at Machu Picchu and Ollantaytambo. They continue on to Lake Titicaca where they investigate the strange megalithic towers and a “stargate” cut into solid rock. Finally, they examine the huge granite megaliths at Tiwanaku and Puma Punku for signs of the use of power tools and other advanced, ancient technology. Blows the lid off South American archaeology with evidence of advanced ancient technology thousands of years old. From UFOTV®, accept no imitations.

 

William Cooper Mystery Babylon Hour 24 Jordan Maxwell Interview

Although I have already shared the Mystery Babylon series, this episode is particularly interesting. Maxwell does most of the talking in this episode and demonstrating the symbolic nature of things like a court of law right through to the Star Wars saga.

The Real Jesus Was A Rich Warrior King! Ralph Ellis

A discussion with a prolific author about one of the most tabboo subjects of all, historical facts that contradict peoples religious beliefs.We explore the real documented social and political conditions at the time which may have lead to the creation of the Jesus character that suited a Roman narrative.That part makes sense, but this is where it gets really interesting, ever heard of the legend of King Arthur and his 12 knights? Sounds a little bit similar to Jesus and the 12 Disciples Doesn’t it? Sounds a lot like the Zodiac, with it’s 12 star signs and a sun (son) in the middle.Well, strangely enough, the story of King Arthur began just a few years after some of the Knights Templar returned from the crusades after liberating a city named Edessa, where the real King Jesus once ruled! It is believed, that King Arthur & his knights was a fictionalized English version of the true Jesus origin story that borrowed elements from other historical figures.This was the Knights Templar’s way of telling the truth without getting executed or tortured to death by the church.

Jesus was a King, born of the highest bloodlines of Rome and Persia, his mother was a rather brazen woman who put her face on the coinage which angered many. She was driven out and took hundreds of courtiers and half the treasury with her. After travelling to Edessa and using the money to build a city state, her son became King Esus of Edessa.
At the time, the seat of Emperor was more or less won by whomsoever could command the most wealth, political support and armed forces, King Esus was one of a number of contenders and thus started a revolution, however, this conflict got him crucified as Emperor Vespasian eventually won the conflict.With the revolution over, word of rebellion spreading throughout the empire had to be stopped as soon as possible, so the King, was crucified. After 3 days on the cross, Rome’s official Jewish historian Josephus Flavius, ordered him to be taken down and given medical attention which saved his life. Flavius then proceeded to rewrite the history for Rome’s sake. After all, the story of King Esus Manu, The One King, Warrior, Revolutionary & rightful ruler of the Kingdoms of Edessa, Persia & the Empire of Rome…
Was a bit too inspirational a story for Jews who’d just been kicked out of Israel and scattered across Europa & the barbarian hordes Rome had waiting at the gates.

Solving 9/11 2016 with Christopher Bollyn

Christopher Bollyn discusses The day that changed America. This was one of his stops on his 2016 Solving 9/11 Ends the war tour across the US.

The World is a Racket: Thoughts about Money

Addendum

In re-reading this article I have found it difficult to understand what exactly it is that I was trying to get at, It certainly is not one of my better efforts, but if it is read as a collection of general thoughts and observations it may make a little more sense, I do seem to recall that when I was writing it, I was struggling to try and find the thread that tied it all together. Quite possible what I was trying to do here was to remove the religion of money from my thinking. At the end of the day, it was still part of my journey so I will leave it up here. As with all of these articles make of it what you will.

Acknowledgement

In writing these articles, I feel that it is necessary to state that I write from the point of view of my own experience, knowledge, and understanding, such as it is. Though this the case, certain influences are brought to bear on my thoughts. Many of these influences are featured in the works I have collected in the archive section of this website. It is also necessary to point out that many the of these works have their detractors and these detractors tend to be one of the main influences on the process of thought that becomes these articles. I say this because I do not believe that it is right or correct to claim someone else’s work as your own, however, at the same time, this kind of plagiarism is a natural and often unknowing and unintended consequence of thought. “There is nothing new under the sun”. 

 The World is a Racket

To be more accurate, the world of human interaction is a racket. The world of human interaction does not exist in our experience without the dynamic of money. The influence of money is the corrupting factor. Money is simply paper with pictures on, we could go into how money is created and fractional reserve banking (see the Zeitgeist trilogy featured in The Archive) but that is not the point of this article and is not required to understand that the only thing which gives money (paper with pictures on) any value at all is faith. Faith placed in the monetary institutions such as banking and government to enforce the value of money and faith placed in the fact that we are told that this paper with pictures on has value and we must strive to obtain it so that we can use it for own purposes not least of all survival.

Survival is the imperative for an increasing amount of people in these times, in order to survive one must be able to pay money. In order to obtain the money to survive, we are constantly asked to do things that we would not be likely to do in any other circumstance. This constant attack can bring about many compromises in both our energy and integrity, it also brings about false ideas about worth, productiveness, happiness, responsibility, gender roles, and many other areas of our inner constitution.

The reason that I say “the world of human interaction is a racket” is that, in order to survive, we must all drink from the same cup, and strive toward the accumulation of money. If I am selling you a product, I may well be aware of a cheaper and better product for your purposes that you can get elsewhere, but if I were to tell you about this item, I risk losing the sale, if selling this product is my living, I am, in effect, taking food out of my own mouth by informing you about this better product. Similarly, if ask for or accept your charity, how can you ever know that I will use the money you gave me, for what I said I needed it for.

Chipping away at each other in these ways is, at the same time, chipping away at ourselves in the sense of our morality. My point is this, How can you be entirely moral when you are forced to survive in a system that is immoral?

You cannot. All you can do is present what you have for the consideration of others and do your best to survive. So, if you have chosen, as your life’s work, the job of researching and circulating alternative information, you must find a way to make pay so that you can survive long enough to do it. This is done, in this field, by selling books, tickets, advertising, dietary supplements, and subscriptions. The other model of monetisation is to go the route of donations.

Both of these methods have their appeals and their flaws but what they both have in common is that they are the imperfect solution to a problem that cannot presently be surmounted, the world is a racket, below a certain amount of wealth the racket is obtaining money, above that amount the racket is the perpetuation of the racket (the maintenance of advantage). One can only judge another person by the correlation of their words and actions based on our own integrity and principles.

The world is a racket for those with below a certain amount of wealth because they must strive, every day, to bring in enough money to survive and for those above that amount of wealth, they must perpetuate the racket to maintain their advantage over those who they hold that advantage.

The Final Push to this Article,

The first part of this article is based on a thought that has been swirling around in my mind for some time now, but what gave me the final push to write this article was a lecture by Manly P. Hall, specifically, Lecture 2 in the Archive. He says that giving does not exist without the giver, meaning that to just give money to something is a hollow action because the “giver” is not giving anything of him or herself, he related this to the charitable giving and a good example of this is when you drop your change in a collection bucket.

How dropping metal and paper in a bucket can be considered giving is quite silly when you think about it. Many times when I have given money in this way it has been because I did not want the hassle of dealing with the odd penny and the charity box was an easier way to dispose of that penny than putting it in my pocket, quite often I have no idea who I have even donated to. Another viewpoint on this is short term feeling of righteousness you can feel when making a slightly bigger donation of money which still does not require you to really give anything, “buying absolution”, you are still relying on someone else to get their hands dirty and you still have no idea what these people are doing with your money.  Now, I am not saying that there aren’t sincere motives for charity or that charitable giving does no good at all, I am, however, seeking to demonstrate how the giving of money is a hollow action. There are many examples of the fact that giving someone your time is far more productive than giving them money, such as parenting.

If you have managed to follow my rather kak-handed method of trying to establish an idea that is already pretty well understood, then you will be hoping I get to point pretty soon. The final push that caused my to write this article was the thought that if giving does not exist without the giver, how does this relate to taking payment? Throughout my life many people have called me lazy, If I had a pound for every person that told me that I did not know the value of hard work, I would be a rich man. To be fair I can and have been very lazy at times in my life, but I have also worked extremely hard at other times and often gone way beyond the call of duty. This contradiction in my behaviour has led me to conclude that the only thing I am not prepared to work hard for is money.

Hard work, in my opinion, is work that requires you to give of yourself, If you are not giving of yourself then the work is merely physically or mentally hard and laborious. When you do put yourself into your work, the difficulty takes on the extra dimension of being something which you care about, this can lead you to take criticisms of your work very personally which makes you more inclined to take more time to create the work and spend a great deal more time thinking about the work.

This summation of what constitutes hard work then leads to two further questions:

1. Is work (other than the necessary day to day work of living) that does not fit this summation worth doing at all?

2. Is money an adequate compensation for doing work that does fit this summation.

Your time is your life, what you give your time to, you give your life to, so the context is all important, In the context of wider society the work of a cleaner, for example, is very important but to the individual cleaner, the job is most likely a mundane grind that they only do for money so in general, the answer to the first question is no. There will always be, however, people that do take a pride in their work but it may also be argued that in taking a pride in your work you are putting into it, an element of yourself. This is one of the reasons why I say “in general, no”.

The answer to the second question is more complex because when a person puts him or herself into their work they often find that the work is its own reward both in its fruits and its process. If you were to paint a picture for a commission and you were to invest a great deal of time on this painting, let’s say the painting was challenging for you and you overcame these challenges and produced something that was genuinely good and that you were very happy with. Would “Cheers, here’s your cheque, piss off” be a satisfactory outcome for you? In the short term perhaps, but the abiding feeling from this experience would most likely be that you hated working for someone who didn’t appreciate your efforts regardless of how much they paid.

Money cannot adequately compensate you for this type of work because this type of work is the process of personal growth and is its own compensation. If you have the inclination, you will do this type of work regardless of whether any payment is in the equation.

I suppose what I am talking about, in reality, is the internalised religion of money the idea that things can be bought owned and possessed. When this way of thinking applies to people and their work, you have a recipe for disaster. Money is a reality of life but money is also an idea and as an idea, it is talismanic, bringing with is other ideas such as hierarchy, ownership, and false authority. The work of personal growth cannot be bought with money, it is bought with time and effort so financial payment is every bit as hollow a gesture as the charitable giving of money in the sense that it is, indeed, giving without the giver.

The world is indeed, a racket.

The Archive: Manly P. Hall

Having heard a lot about Manly P. Hall its fair to say that I was given to imagining that this man was the architect of the NWO, in listening to his lectures I discovered that this was not the case. The more you listen to Manly P. Hall’s talks the more you realise the wisdom therein as such Manly P. Hall’s work warrants its own page in this archive. These lectures are in no particular order.

Lecture 1

It is so easy to be ignorant and self-righteous believing that you know it all as we grow old. But attaining spiritual wisdom takes much more than passively growing old. Wisdom and spiritual maturity could be some grand illusions for many of us. The master occult scholar Manly P. Hall shares his insight on how to become wise as years pass by.

Lecture 2

We are dealing with so many things in life yet learning so little from them. Instead of passively let them confuse you, you can utilize them for constructive living and furthermore, for self-mastery. Such process is like trying to write your own textbook for self-realization, designed specifically for you. Strategic approaches can bring many benefits and the same rule applies on this matter. The master occult scholar Manly P. Hall share his insight on the subject with this brilliant lecture.
[Occult Lecture] Self-Mastery from Mentally Utilizing Your Daily Experience (by Manly P. Hall)

Lecture 3

[Occult Lecture] Unveiling the Hidden Mysteries of Human Mind (by Manly P. Hall)
There are many layers of human mind that we are unaware of and unlocking those mysteries of the human mind could be the key to your spiritual & alchemical development. The master occult scholar Manly P. Hall shares his insight on the subject with this brilliant lecture.

Lecture 4

In this talk, entiltled Secret Powers & Unseen Forces (The Invisible Entities and Energies), Manly P. Hall discusses the pitfalls of dabbling with the occult.